Monday, May 18, 2020

Tips for Mastering English Grammar for New Learners

English grammar is said to be one of the most difficult to learn for native foreign-language speakers especially because of its countless rules and numerous exceptions to them. However, many English as an Alternative Language (EAL) teachers has developed methods to help these English grammar learners through the process of understanding proper usage and style. If students follow simple, repetitive steps to understand each new element of grammar, some linguists note, they will eventually pick up on the understanding of those rules, though English learners must be careful not to forget about rules and exceptions in particular circumstances. As a result, one of the best ways to learn proper English grammar for foreign learners is to read several example sentences in grammar textbooks in order to experience every possible variation of each grammar rule. This ensures that despite the commonly held principles associated with each instance, new learners will also experience when English, as it often does, breaks the rules. Practice Makes Perfect When learning any new skill, the old adage practice makes perfect really does hold true, especially when it comes to understanding and applying proper English grammar skills; however, improper practice makes for an  improper performance, so its important for English learners to fully grasp grammar rules and exceptions before practicing usage themselves. Each element of usage and style must be looked at and mastered individually before applying in conversation or writing to ensure that new learners grasp core concepts. Some EAL teachers recommend following these three steps: Read a short clear easily understandable explanation of a grammar rule.Study several practical usage examples (sentences) illustrating that particular grammar rule. Check yourself whether you have mastered the examples.Do several exercises for that rule with communicative content with sentences that most likely can be used in real life situations. Grammar exercises that contain dialogues, interrogative and statement (or narrative) sentences on everyday topics, thematic texts and narrative stories are especially effective for mastering grammatical structures and should also include listening comprehension and speaking, not just reading and writing. Challenges and Longevity in Mastering English Grammar EAL teachers and new learners alike should keep in mind that true mastery or even understanding of English grammar takes years to develop, which isnt to say that students wont be able to use English fluently fairly quickly, but rather that proper grammar is challenging even for native English speakers. Still, learners cannot rely on real-life communication alone to be proficient in using grammatically correct English. Only understanding spoke or colloquial English has a tendency to result in misuse and improper grammar for non-native English speakers, who often omit words articles like the and to-be verbs like are when trying to say Did you see the movie? and instead of saying you see the movie? Correct oral communication in English is based on knowledge of English phonetics, grammar, vocabulary, and on practice and experience in communicating with native English speakers in real life. I would argue that first, a learner must master at least basic English grammar from books with exercises before being able to communicate grammatically correctly in real life with native speakers of English.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Bilibgual education Essay - 894 Words

Bilibgual education The Detrimental Effect of an Education in a Foreign Language California passed a proposition in 1997 that ended funding for teaching children solely in their native language. Instead of these programs, opulent citizens will provide funding for the English as a Second Language (ESL) program in Californias public schools. These ESL classes will have non-native speakers learn subjects in English and their native language simultaneously. Even though the proposition passed, the issue of which plan is more beneficial continues to spark debate. On the one hand, ethnic groups say the law is unjust because their children cannot understand English. They argue that their children need to be taught in their native tongue. Most†¦show more content†¦Fortunately, the ESL plan eliminated all forms of public funding for teaching non-native speakers. Private money is used for the ESL program. Thus all of the tax money will be going towards the education of the children who se parents paid taxes. Ultimately tax money is better allocated under the ESL plan. The second major problem with the old system was that a childs education was being adversely affected in the long run. Basic elements, such as reading and writing, are important to develop at a young age. Even if a child learns these basic skills in a language that is different from the one that is spoken in society, it remains detrimental to their future because it inhibits their childs participation in society. The old plan of teaching children in their native tongue was only hurting students by preventing them integrating themselves into the larger society. Admittedly, some students would have an easier time learning some subjects because they were taught in their native language, but they would now be able to translate their knowledge into achievement of language barriers. Although the ESL program takes much more time to teach children in both English and their own respective languages, it would have a more effective long-term outcome. The ESL program bridges a gap between their language and English, as Heda 3 opposed to the old plan that left them mired in their old language while lived in a

Managing Leading and Stewardship Business

Question: Discuss about the Managing Leading and Stewardship Business. Answer: Introduction Background With the introduction of ethics, values, or principles in organizational and business courses, Enron is one of the first businesses to be thought about. This is due to a complete breakdown of values on the behalf of its leadership. The ramifications for Enrons employees, stockholders, and internal and external stakeholders owing to its leadership, introduced an era of increased attention to the goings-on of organizations (Cunliffe, 2014). This change in how businesses are viewed by the public and government entities alone is reason enough for leaders to place a high level of importance on how they are viewed regarding their communication of organizational values. Leaders today have grown from the time seminal leadership research was presented by Burns in 1978 and Bass in 1985 (Copeland, 2014). Ample information exists to reinforce the need for leaders to communicate their organizations values inside and outside their organization. The objective of this paper is to discuss the case of Enron and analyze the questionable management practices. The Enron scandal occurred in 2004. However, the case of Enron is still significant today. The paper would analyze the role of managers and leaders to avoid the compromised business practices. The reasons for the questionable management practices can be discussed as: Issues Identified and Analysis The sheer profit making is the major driver of the compromised business practices used at Enron. Encouraging value-based decision-making in an organization supports the development of an organizational culture that becomes contagious in formal and informal situations. However, the leaders of Enron were not able to inculcate the value-based leadership at Enron. The organizational theory of leadership suggests that the leaders role is to expect followers to maintain ethical behavior and develop followers into leaders who exhibit ethical behavior. Leaders must consistently inspect what they expect and guide change where necessary to ensure that the organizational culture remains positive and ethical. The stakeholder theory suggests that the leaders and managers should take the decision that is best for all the stakeholders of the organization. However, the leaders of Enron ignored the interest of important stakeholders of the organization like customers, and investors. Values define the organization and how internal and external stakeholders view it. Another way to look at the definition of values is that they are synonymous with ethics, morals, and principles. From the analysis of Enron case, it can be said that the senior leadership team of Enron was responsible and accountable for the complete financial debacle. The stakeholder theory suggests that it was the duty of leaders to take care of the interest of all the stakeholders. However, the leaders of Enron failed in this. Fox (2013) provided some steps to improve the process and even argued that accountability and efficiency are important elements. The article provides the normal thoughts - employee empowerment and that leadership is important. However, the one that caught my attention was the idea that the leader needs to select the right staff - a small team (Fox, 2013). Recommendations for Enron It is recommended that Enron should focus on value-based leadership. Actions, Daft (2015) noted, speak louder than words, and employees tendto take their cues from what their leadership does more so than from what itsays. This is certainly not to say that leaders and followers who practice values-basedleadership are immune to mistakes and moral failures. Rather, they strive to be honest, ethical,humble, and tolerant of others mistakes.When they do fail, as all people do from time to time, they are open abouttheir mistakes and accept the responsibility for them (Daft, 2015).The goal ofvalues-based leadership is to create an organizational culture that is healthy,positive, and supportive of organizational goals by always doing what is right. This seems to me to be a goal allorganizations should strive to reach. They are two possible answers, depending on whether the leaders personal values fusion with the companies expressed culture or not. The first one may result in the development of greater employee loyalty and respect for the organization inside and outside. Inside the organization, i.e. the leader will communicate to the employees his values, which in turn are the organizational values (Foss, 2015). And the same values will be communicated to the customers, the community and the governments. In the case the leaders values do not match the organizational values, the leaders need to rebuild first his own values and second the employees values. To put the World in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must put the family in order; to put the family in order, we must cultivate our personal life; and to cultivate our personal life, we must set our hearts straight. It is recommended that the leaders at Enron should focus on contemporary view of performance management system. The performance management process is a dreaded requirement (Foss, 2015). The reason it is a dreaded requirement by employees and supervisors alike is because of perspective and the way it is utilized. There needs to be a change in the stigma surrounding performance appraisals. I have seen the process dreaded from the supervisor process because if it is only truly mechanistic and transitional, an employee will always disregard its importance. On the other hand, if a leader looks to be transformational rather than mechanistic and incorporates the performance management process in an everyday and routine feedback routine; it will not be despised (Luhman, 2012). A leader must look to build a true relationship with their followers and they should not only see their leaders when there is something wrong. It has to do with building productive and meaningful relationships with you r employees. Employees actually do look for meaningful feedback on a day-to-day basis regarding their responsibilities and want a leader that is interested in their long-term goals, aspirations, and development (Fox, 2013). People want to grow and get better at their activities but can only do so with effective, adequate, ongoing feedback. The control theory of leadership suggests that senior leaders should create policy and structure that influence the patterns that become imprinted within the climate in the formation of the culture (Fulmer Ostroff, 2016). The behaviors of leaders drive that climate through which the behaviors through role modeling and communication which in turn provides the motivation for subordinates to achieve the needed tasks to meet the objectives and goals for the organization. The institutional theory considers the processes by which structures, including schemes; rules, norms, and routines, become established as authoritative guidelines for social behavior. Conclusion As a conclusion, it can be said Leaders are essential in communicating organizational values inside and outside of the organization because by this being done, followers can hear and see the importance of organizational values straight from leadership (Hopkins, 2016). This is important because it is a clear indication that leaders are setting the tone for subordinates. In addition, Values are important to understanding leadership because they explain the focus and direction of people's actions (Fernandez Hogan, 2002, p.25) In order for leaders to fully understand the importance of setting the tone, Hopkins and Scott (2016) indicates that culture should play a major role in determining values. The most effective leaders understand that people come in all shapes and sizes and one type of leadership many not serve well in every situation. For these reasons and others leaders have to remain true to their core values so that the message sent to others below can follow the same path. References Copeland, M. K. (2014). The emerging significance of values based leadership: A literature review. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 105-135 Cunliffe, Ann L (2014) A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Management, 2nd edition. SAGE Publications. Daft, R. L. (2015).Organization theory and design(12th ed.) Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning. Hopkins, Willie E. and Scott, Susanne G. (2016). "Values-based leadership effectiveness in culturally diverse workplaces". Cross Cultural Strategic Management (2059-5794), 23 (2), 363. DOI: 10.1108/CCSM-11-2014-0125 Henry, C., Foss, L., Fayolle, A., Walker, E. and Duffy, S., 2015. Entrepreneurial Leadership and Gender: Exploring Theory and Practice in Global Contexts.Journal of Small Business Management,53(3), pp.581-586. Fox, T. (2013). Improving employee performance reviews.Washington Post.Electronically retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2013/09/06/improving-employee-performance-reviews/ Fulmer, C. A., Ostroff, C. (2016). Convergence and emergence in organizations: An integrative framework and review.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S122-S145. doi:10.1002/job.1987 Luhman, John T and Cunliffe, Ann L (2012) Key Concepts in Organization Theory. SAGE Publications.